- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 826C vs. John Deere 646
Caterpillar 826C vs. John Deere 646
9 reasons to buy Caterpillar 826C:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 85 l. and 34.1 l. | 60 % more or 50.9 l. |
| Transmission fluid volume | 62 l. and 36.9 l. | 40 % more or 25.1 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 115 l. and 66.2 l. | 42 % more or 48.8 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 28 l. and 16.1 l. | 42 % more or 11.9 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 189.3 l. | 68 % more or 410.7 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 254.3 kW and 105.1 kW | 59 % more or 149.2 kW |
| Effective power | 234.9 kW and 97.7 kW | 58 % more or 137.2 kW |
| Displacement | 14.6 l. and 6.6 l. | 55 % more or 8.0 l. |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
1 reasons to buy John Deere 646:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
| Front wheels roller width | 1200 mm and 584 mm |
| Front wheels roller diameter | 1525 mm and 1397 mm |
| Rear wheels roller width | 1200 mm and 584 mm |
| Rear wheels roller diameter | 1525 mm and 1397 mm |
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 7718 mm and 6300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3987 mm and 3130 mm |
| Width between wheels | 3800 mm and 2650 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3530 mm and 3640 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 31630 kg and 13613.2 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Cat. planetary powershift transmission and powershift |
| Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
Blades
| Width | 4470 mm and 2810 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 7718 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 6300 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 3800 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 2650 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3987 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3130 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3530 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3640 mm |