- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 836H vs. Bomag BC672RB
Caterpillar 836H vs. Bomag BC672RB
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836H:
Sizes
Clearance | 593 mm and 580 mm | 2 % more or 13 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 793 l. and 500 l. | 37 % more or 293 l. |
Engine oil volume | 60 l. and 26 l. | 57 % more or 34 l. |
Motor
Full power | 390 kW and 330 kW | 15 % more or 60 kW |
2 reasons to buy Bomag BC672RB:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 350 l. and 137 l. | 61 % more or 213 l. |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 12 km/h and 10.9 km/h | 9 % more or 1.1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
Front wheels roller width | 1400 mm and 1350 mm |
Front wheels roller diameter | 1720 mm and 1620 mm |
Rear wheels roller width | 1400 mm and 1125 mm |
Rear wheels roller diameter | 1720 mm and 1620 mm |
Sizes
Wheelbase | 4550 mm and 3500 mm |
Length with blade on ground level | 10182 mm and 8120 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4157 mm and 4100 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 53681.7 kg and 32200 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
Model | C18 diesel with ACERT Technology and BF6M1015CP |
Blades
Height | 2222 mm and 1950 mm |
Width | 5193 mm and 4356 mm |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 593 mm | 5. Clearance | 580 mm |
1. Length with blade on ground level | 10182 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8120 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4157 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4100 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 4550 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm |