- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 836K vs. Volvo 4600B
Caterpillar 836K vs. Volvo 4600B
10 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836K:
Sizes
| Clearance | 630.9 mm and 520 mm | 18 % more or 110.9 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 791.2 l. and 360 l. | 54 % more or 431.2 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 106 l. and 50 l. | 53 % more or 56 l. |
| Transmission fluid volume | 121.1 l. and 45 l. | 63 % more or 76.1 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 419.1 kW and 196.9 kW | 53 % more or 222.2 kW |
| Effective power | 369.9 kW and 187.9 kW | 49 % more or 182.0 kW |
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 9.6 l. | 47 % more or 8.5 l. |
| Maximum torque | 3084.5 Nm and 1328.7 Nm | 57 % more or 1755.8 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
1 reasons to buy Volvo 4600B:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 238.5 l. | 20 % more or 61.5 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm and 8280 mm |
| Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm and 3060 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm and 3550 mm |
| Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm and 3550 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 55936.6 kg and 26540 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
| Model | C18 Acert and TD 101 G |
Gear box
| Transmission type | planetary powershift transmission - ECPC and Volvo HT200 powershift |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8280 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 3060 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3550 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 630.9 mm | 5. Clearance | 520 mm |