- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Caterpillar 977L vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Caterpillar 977L vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 977L:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 49.2 l. and 41.6 l. | 15 % more or 7.6 l. |
| Maximum speed | 11.3 km/h and 9 km/h | 20 % more or 2.3 km/h |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 386 l. | 10 % more or 41.8 l. |
| Each final drive fluid volume | 28.4 l. and 25.6 l. | 10 % more or 2.8 l. |
| Bucket capacity with top | 4.7 m3 and 2.1 m3 | 55 % more or 2.6 m3 |
| Engine oil volume | 29 l. and 27.4 l. | 6 % more or 1.6 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 178.2 kW and 141.7 kW | 20 % more or 36.5 kW |
Carrier
| Contact with ground area | 2.9 m2 and 2.6 m2 | 10 % more or 0.3 m2 |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 21610 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Caterpillar |
| Model | 3306 and C9 |
Carrier
| Track width | 1930 mm and 2082.8 mm |
| Track shoe width | 457 mm and 500 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2810 mm and 2930 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 9. Track width | 1930 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |