- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Caterpillar 385B L vs. Caterpillar EL240B
Caterpillar 385B L vs. Caterpillar EL240B
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385B L:
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 79.9 l. and 15 l. | 81 % more or 64.9 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 18.9 l. and 9.5 l. | 50 % more or 9.4 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 1241.6 l. and 280 l. | 77 % more or 961.6 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 101.1 l. and 26.4 l. | 74 % more or 74.7 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 382.5 kW and 110.4 kW | 71 % more or 272.1 kW |
| Displacement | 15.8 l. and 6.6 l. | 58 % more or 9.2 l. |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.5 km/h and 3.4 km/h | 24 % more or 1.1 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar EL240B:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10.2 rev / min and 6.2 rev / min | 39 % more or 4.0 rev |
Carrier
| Hook traction force | 183 kN and 591.7 kN | 69 % less or 408.7 kN |
| Track shoes number per side | 50 and 47 | 6 % more or 3 |
Neutral reasons:
Motor
| Model | Caterpillar 3456 ATAAC and 3116 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 762 mm and 800 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 8 |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 762 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 800 mm |