- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 792 vs. Caterpillar 312D L
John Deere 792 vs. Caterpillar 312D L
8 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm and 2590 mm | 19 % more or 600 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 450 l. and 250 l. | 44 % more or 200 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 45 l. and 17.9 l. | 60 % more or 27.1 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 162 l. | 59 % more or 238 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 19.5 l. | 15 % more or 3.5 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 3 l. | 75 % more or 9 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 134 kW and 67.1 kW | 50 % more or 66.9 kW |
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 4.3 l. | 43 % more or 3.3 l. |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 312D L:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 35000 kPa and 25995 kPa | 26 % more or 9005 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 127 l/min and 260 l/min | 51 % less or 133 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 27342 kg and 13450 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Caterpillar |
| Model | 400 lot and C4.2 ACERT |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm and 2830 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm and 7610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2590 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7610 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2830 mm |