- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- New Holland E135SR vs. Caterpillar E200B
New Holland E135SR vs. Caterpillar E200B
3 reasons to buy New Holland E135SR:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 33000 kPa and 31371.1 kPa | 5 % more or 1628.9 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 236 l/min and 356 l/min | 34 % less or 120 l/min |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum loading height | 6200 mm and 6050 mm | 2 % more or 150 mm |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar E200B:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2800 mm and 2490 mm | 11 % more or 310 mm |
| Clearance | 465 mm and 455 mm | 2 % more or 10 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 5680 mm and 5500 mm | 3 % more or 180 mm |
| Maximum radius along ground level | 8850 mm and 8830 mm | 0 % more or 20 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 1425 mm and 2750 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 14700 kg and 18800 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Caterpillar |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 500 mm and 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer length | 7470 mm and 9705 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2490 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2800 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 455 mm | 5. Clearance | 465 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1425 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2750 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 5500 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 5680 mm |
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7470 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 9510 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 6200 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 6500 mm |
| 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 8830 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 9375 mm |