- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Volvo EC210BNC vs. Caterpillar 320B
Volvo EC210BNC vs. Caterpillar 320B
10 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNC:
Shovel
| Maximum bucket volume | 1.6 m3 and 1.5 m3 | 6 % more or 0.1 m3 |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 50 amperes | 37 % more or 30 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 350 l. and 340 l. | 3 % more or 10 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 27.5 l. and 25 l. | 9 % more or 2.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 220 l. | 25 % more or 75 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 25 l. and 20.5 l. | 18 % more or 4.5 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 370 l/min | 95 % less or 351 l/min |
Motor
| Full power | 118.6 kW and 99.9 kW | 16 % more or 18.7 kW |
| Effective power | 107 kW and 95.4 kW | 11 % more or 11.6 kW |
| Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320B:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 34300 kPa | 0 % more or 35.9 kPa |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.4 l. and 5.7 l. | 11 % more or 0.7 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 20900 kg and 19400 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Caterpillar |
| Model | D6D EFE2 and 3066T |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 600 mm |
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5.5 km/h |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |