- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- John Deere 80 vs. JCB 8052
John Deere 80 vs. JCB 8052
7 reasons to buy John Deere 80:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm and 2000 mm | 15 % more or 360 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 17 l/min and 126 l/min | 87 % less or 109 l/min |
| Fuel Capacity | 135.1 l. and 70 l. | 48 % more or 65.1 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 8.5 l. and 5 l. | 41 % more or 3.5 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 41 kW and 34.7 kW | 15 % more or 6.3 kW |
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 2.2 l. | 33 % more or 1.1 l. |
| Maximum torque | 223.7 Nm and 135 Nm | 40 % more or 88.7 Nm |
5 reasons to buy JCB 8052:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 25000.4 kPa and 13730 kPa | 45 % more or 11270.4 kPa |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 8 l. and 5.7 l. | 29 % more or 2.3 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 67 l. and 60.6 l. | 10 % more or 6.4 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
| Torque measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 35 % more or 700 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 10 rev / min |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 7124.1 kg and 5200 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
| Model | 4TNE98-JCF and 404-22 |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm and 2555 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm and 48.8 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2000 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 48.8 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2555 mm |