- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- John Deere 80 vs. Komatsu PC80-1
John Deere 80 vs. Komatsu PC80-1
3 reasons to buy John Deere 80:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm and 2230 mm | 6 % more or 130 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 135.1 l. and 120 l. | 11 % more or 15.1 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 17 l/min and 262 l/min | 94 % less or 245 l/min |
5 reasons to buy Komatsu PC80-1:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.4 rev / min and 10 rev / min | 12 % more or 1.4 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 140 l. and 60.6 l. | 57 % more or 79.4 l. |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 20594.6 kPa and 13730 kPa | 33 % more or 6864.6 kPa |
Motor
| Displacement | 4.3 l. and 3.3 l. | 23 % more or 1.0 l. |
| Maximum torque | 245 Nm and 223.7 Nm | 9 % more or 21.3 Nm |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 7124.1 kg and 7700 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Yanmar and Komatsu |
| Model | 4TNE98-JCF and 4D105 |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm and 2625 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm and 6090 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2230 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 6090 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2625 mm |