- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- John Deere 80 vs. New Holland E50
John Deere 80 vs. New Holland E50
6 reasons to buy John Deere 80:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 8.8 rev / min | 12 % more or 1.2 rev |
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm and 1194.8 mm | 49 % more or 1165.2 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 135.1 l. and 53 l. | 61 % more or 82.1 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 17 l/min and 57.2 l/min | 70 % less or 40.2 l/min |
Motor
| Effective power | 41 kW and 30.4 kW | 26 % more or 10.6 kW |
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 2.2 l. | 33 % more or 1.1 l. |
3 reasons to buy New Holland E50:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 63 l. and 60.6 l. | 4 % more or 2.4 l. |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 23000.9 kPa and 13730 kPa | 40 % more or 9270.9 kPa |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 7124.1 kg and 4660.7 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Yanmar and Yanmar |
| Model | 4TNE98-JCF and 4TNV88-XYB |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm and 2590.8 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm and 5233.4 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1194.8 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 5233.4 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2590.8 mm |