- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Caterpillar 775D vs. Komatsu HD465-5
Caterpillar 775D vs. Komatsu HD465-5
9 reasons to buy Caterpillar 775D:
Weight
Unloaded front weight distribution | 47.3 % and 47 % | 1 % more or 0.3 % |
Loaded front weight distribution | 33.3 % and 32 % | 4 % more or 1.3 % |
Operation
Engine oil volume | 68 l. and 52 l. | 24 % more or 16 l. |
Differential/final drive fluid volume | 155 l. and 126.5 l. | 18 % more or 28.5 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 27 l. and 23.2 l. | 14 % more or 3.8 l. |
Cylinders number | 12 and 6 | 50 % more or 6 |
Dump
Lifting time | 9.5 sec and 11.5 sec | 17 % less or 2.0 sec |
Brimmed lifting capacity | 31.4 m3 and 25 m3 | 20 % more or 6.4 m3 |
Lifting capacity with top | 41.5 m3 and 34.2 m3 | 18 % more or 7.3 m3 |
7 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-5:
Weight
Unloaded rear weight distribution | 53 % and 52.7 % | 1 % more or 0.3 % |
Loaded rear weight distribution | 68 % and 66.7 % | 2 % more or 1.3 % |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 780 l. and 700 l. | 10 % more or 80 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 171 l. and 151 l. | 12 % more or 20 l. |
Motor
Full power | 551.1 kW and 540.6 kW | 2 % more or 10.5 kW |
Effective power | 533.2 kW and 516.8 kW | 3 % more or 16.4 kW |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 70 km/h and 65.8 km/h | 6 % more or 4.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Weight without load | 43227.4 kg and 42500 kg |
Laden weight | 106594.2 kg and 96100 kg |
Operation
Tyre size | 24.00-R35 and 24.00R35 |
Motor
Model | 3412ETA and SAA6D170E |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Gear box
Transmission type | powershift and automatic |
Forward gears number | 7 and 7 |
Reverse gears number | 1 and 1 |
Dump
Nominal payload | 63366.9 kg and 49895.2 kg |
Images


